Jilted by the New York Times
January 5th, 2012 © by Susan SwartzFor the first time in a long time the newspaper didn’t arrive that morning. Was not waiting at the foot of the stairs. Never got spread across the kitchen table. So it seemed a cosmic fluke or unhappy coincidence that by noon that day the word was out that our newspaper had been sold.
The Press Democrat, owned for 26 years by the New York Times, had gone to an obscure media group named Halifax. My first thought was why would a bunch of Nova Scotians want a paper in Sonoma County? When Halifax was identified as a Florida group I thought uh-oh. Florida — conservative, anti-union. Not good.
But the sad part was that our newspaper – I say “our” because I worked there before and after the Times took ownership – had grown into an important paper under the banner of the Times, the mother of all newspapers. And now mother had left us on some Halifax doorstep and disappeared.
What would happen now? Would the new owners bust the union? Turn the paper into a Tea Party bulletin, a rah-rah chamber of commerce pro-business sheet? Or let it be what it is?
I worried about the people inside, former colleagues and friends, family really. Some with young kids. Some a few years away from retiring. Married couples dependent on one employer. Had this been happening when my husband and I still worked there and had kids at home I would have been in the ladies room throwing up.
Back in 1985 there were also rumors that the family-owned paper was going to sell. When we heard the New York Times was the new boss we hit the bar across the street and started celebrating. If you were going to be taken over by a newspaper chain this was the best.
You have to understand this was a big deal to newspaper people in Santa Rosa California. It allowed the hometown paper to think bigger, shed its provincial image and take on a more sophisticated world view. There was more investigative journalism of local issues. Reporters and photographers went out of town to explore national and global subjects. I had a great time. The new publisher invited me to write a twice weekly column and said I could write about whatever I wanted. The Times news service put my column on their wire and I was getting letters from readers in Chicago and Seattle.
Our business cards came with the prestigious NYT logo. We were not the New York Times of 43rd Street, more like a second cousin to the Gray Lady, but we were a New York Times paper. That meant status not only for journalists but the community as well to have the local paper connected to the Times.
Not that it wasn’t mutually satisfying. The Press Democrat was a good investment. Sonoma County wasn’t just a nice place for Times execs to come visit and sample the wine, the paper made them proud (winning the Pulitzer among other awards) and we made them lots of money.
And when tough times hit the newspaper business and advertising revenue started to decline the Press Democrat made sacrifices, freezing salaries, squeezing staff, nudging retirees.
And now, in a move to presumably save the mother ship, the Times decided to cut off the distant cousins. Business-wise that probably makes sense and wasn’t a shock but the cold and quick way it came down was. News of the sale was leaked to an online media blogger which hurried the official announcement. Employees were told by New York via email that Halifax would be deciding their futures. The staff, the paper, its readers and the community were unceremoniously dumped.
The New York Times was a good company to work for. It’s still a great paper to read. Same for the Press Democrat. Both almost always hit our front steps every morning. But I still feel jilted.
Tags: journalism, Juicy_Tomatoes, newspapers, New_York_Times, Santa_Rosa_Press_Democrat, Susan_Swartz





January 5th, 2012 at 5:46 pm
Nothing like the NY Times giving employees at the Press Democrat a lump of coal and “don’t let the door bang you in the butt on your way out” note of cheer right before Christmas. Oh, I know, it was a blogger who let the cat out of the Christmas stocking, but really…the whole thing stinks. I’m worried about whether the ole PD will still be the outstanding paper it has been, even with diminished resources and staff layoffs they’ve already sustained…but mainly, I’m worried about my friends, the super-hard, dedicated reporters, editorial assistants (oh, I forgot, they’re long gone), advertising folks and all who get the paper out every day. Congrats and best wishes to all of you.
January 6th, 2012 at 8:18 pm
When the Times arrived at the Press Democrat, it was exhilarating–we became part of American journalism’s royal family, even if just second cousins, once removed. And I think we all did our best to live up to that. When I retired in 1990 I lived in a Pacific beach town in Mexico. An old-timer there, unofficial greeter of visiting sailboats, even less official local represenative of the US embassy, had a habit of making everyone he knew the best, the top person in whatever field they had once been in. So I shouldn’t have been surprised when he introduced me as “the former editor of the New York Times.” From former editor of the lifestyle section on a Times regional paper to that was the loftiest border promotion I’d ever heard.
Good luck to all our former colleagues and young replacements. May Halifax be kind to them.
January 7th, 2012 at 9:46 am
It’s possible to live well and intelligently without a real newspaper, like it’s possible to live without mom and dad, or one or two of those wise friends you had, or without having read one or two of those best books in your life. It’s possible because most of Merka’s been doing it for decades, though not necessarily well and intelligently (“Oooh, look. I gotta read this new story on Mitt Romney/Kardashian/Illegal Alien Invasion!!!”).
Down here in San Diego (3.3 million people) we have a franchise that went from a family that never saw a war it didn’t love to a financial flipper called, swear to gods, Platinum Holding, to the world’s biggest hypocrite, Doug Manchester (Sheraton Hotels, and malls) who bankrolled the attack on California’s gay marriage proposition at the same time he was supporting GOProud, the national gay Republcans in D.C. Our new owner monikered it with a new line just below the masthead (“America’s Finest City/The World’s Greatest Country”) and now says he’s going to dedicate the newly renamed UT San Diego (for the old Union-Tribune), to a campaign for a billion-dollar tax subsidy to build a new stadium so that the dead-last Chargers won’t leave town.
Will all of us down here get stoopid?
Nope, uh, uh. We just won’t read the newspaper any more. Damnit.
January 14th, 2012 at 3:42 pm
Oh Dorn, this is such a sad report. But so well said, like the journalist you are.